![]() ![]() It focuses on how various go-betweens mediated political, cultural, religious and linguistic boundaries in the encounters between Ottoman grandees and European diplomats. In conclusion, the article directs readers to reconsider Grand Vizier Kara Mustafa Paşa’s ambitious undertakings – especially the siege of Vienna – as a combined outcome of the decision-making patterns established by the first two Köprülüs, coupled with the self-assurance that Kara Mustafa Paşa had attained long before his appointment as the sultan’s ‘absolute deputy’.īy drawing on documents from European archives, this article addresses everyday aspects of diplomacy in sixteenth-century Constantinople. Further, I illustrate that Kara Mustafa Paşa had already established himself as a self-assured individual in Ottoman bureaucracy long before he became the grand vizier. ![]() ![]() I demonstrate that, by the time Kara Mustafa Paşa assumed the grand vizierate in 1676, the achievements of Köprülü Mehmed Paşa and, more remarkably, his son Fazıl Ahmed Paşa, had elevated the post of the grand vizierate to a practically unrivalled status in the Ottoman decision-making process. ![]() In response to the recently expanding ‘renewal of faith’ literature and religion-based approaches to the Ottoman seventeenth century, this article sources the many available Ottoman chronicles and European diplomatic reports to shed light on the accumulation of full executive power in the hands of Köprülü grand viziers, starting from 1656. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |